York

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARVELLO L. TUFONO, No. 2:24-cv-00164-TLN-CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 C. YORK, 15 Defendant. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on pro se Plaintiff Arvello L. Tufono’s (“Plaintiff”) 18 Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s December 16, 2024 Order. (ECF No. 32.) No 19 opposition has been filed. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 2 A detailed recitation of the factual and procedural history is not necessary for disposition 3 of Plaintiff’s motion. On October 17, 2024, the magistrate judge issued findings and 4 recommendations, recommending the action be dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure 5 to respond to Defendant C. York’s (“Defendant”) motion to revoke Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis 6 status. (ECF No. 28.) Plaintiff did not file objections to the findings and…