(PS) Douglas v. The Ezralow Co., LLC.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 20252:24-cv-00331California823 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHERYL LYNN DOUGLAS, et al., No. 2:24-cv-0331-KJM-CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO SERVE

14 THE EZRALOW COMPANY LLC, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiffs Cheryl Lynn Douglas and Andrew Grant Haymore proceed without counsel on a 18 complaint filed on January 29, 2024. This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 19 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). After payment of the filing fee, plaintiffs were issued 20 summons by the Clerk of Court to serve the defendants on June 7, 2024. (ECF No. 5.) On the 21 same date, the court issued an initial scheduling order informing plaintiffs that, pursuant to Rule 22 4, “Plaintiff[s] shall complete service of process on all defendants named in the complaint within 23 90 days from the date of this order.” (ECF No. 6 at 2.) The court cautioned plaintiffs that under 24 Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “this case may be dismissed if service of 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.