Renjie
(PS) Windham El v. Renjie
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROSALYN ANGELA WINDHAM EL, No. 2:25-cv-1500-DJC-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 JUAN RENJIE, et. al., 15 Defendants. 16
17 18 This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 19 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff filed an application in support of her request to proceed in forma 20 pauperis. (ECF No. 2.) Plaintiff’s application makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915, 21 however the application is not signed by the plaintiff. See Local Rule 131(b). Accordingly, 22 plaintiff’s application is denied without prejudice subject to refiling with plaintiff’s signature. 23 Plaintiff’s pro se complaint filed on May 29, 2025, is now before the Court for screening. (ECF 24 No. 1.) 25 I. Screening Requirement 26 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the court must screen every in forma pauperis 27 proceeding, and must order dismissal of the case if it is “frivolous or malicious,” “fails to state a 28 claim on which relief may be granted,” or “seeks…