Haacke
Haacke v. Pfister CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff and appellant Rodney Haacke filed a civil action against defendant and
respondent Desrie Pfister arising out of disputes related to the management of their
parents’ trust. In May 2023, the case proceeded to trial before a jury on causes of action
for breach of contract and fraud. However, at the conclusion of plaintiff’s case-in-chief,
the trial court granted a motion for nonsuit and entered judgment in defendant’s favor.
Plaintiff appeals from the judgment. After consideration of the arguments made by
plaintiff in his opening brief, we affirm the judgment.
II. BACKGROUND
A. Operative Complaint and Allegations
The operative pleading in this case is the second amended complaint (SAC) filed
on July 2021. According to the SAC, Karl Haacke and Veva Haacke established the
Haacke Family Trust (the Trust) in 1994 shortly before Karl Haacke passed away. In
2012, Veva Haacke was diagnosed with cognitive issues related to dementia, resulting in
plaintiff and defendant succeeding as co-trustees of the Trust. From 2012-2017,
defendant allegedly engaged in numerous acts of mismanagement involving Trust assets.