Schoenbeck
Schoenbeck v. United States
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 THOMAS J. SCHOENBECK, Case No.: 23-cv-01635-RSH-JLB
14 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART EX
15 v. PARTE MOTION TO AMEND
SCHEDULING ORDER
16 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
17 Defendant. [ECF No. 50] 18 19 Before the Court is an Ex Parte Motion to Amend Scheduling Order filed by Plaintiff 20 Thomas J. Schoenbeck (“Plaintiff”). (ECF No. 50.) Plaintiff requests that the Court vacate 21 the deadlines contained in the Court’s May 28, 2025, Scheduling Order and extend the 22 discovery deadlines pending a new Case Management Conference with the participation 23 of Plaintiff, Plaintiff’s counsel, and Defendant United States of America (“Defendant”). 24 (Id. at 1.) Defendant filed a response. (ECF No. 55.) On July 9, 2025, the Court held a 25 hearing on the motion. (ECF No. 59.) As discussed during the hearing, the Court 26 GRANTS IN PART the Ex Parte Motion, and amends the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 27 48) as follows: 28 /// 1 1. …