Pardo

Pardo v. The County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 20253:24-cv-01062California7,213 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 FRANCISCO S. PARDO, M.D.; Case No.: 24-CV-1062 JLS (SBC)

RICARDO JOAQUIN; FRANCISCO

11 PARDO; MARIA-AMELIA PARDO; and ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 12 VICTOR PARDO, MOTION TO DISMISS

PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED

13 Plaintiffs,

COMPLAINT

14 v. (ECF No. 22) 15 THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Presently before the Court are Defendant County of San Diego’s (“County”) Motion 19 to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (“Mot.,” ECF No. 22) and 20 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support thereof (“Mem.,” ECF No. 22-1). Also 21 before the Court are Plaintiffs Francisco S. Pardo, Ricardo Joaquin, Francisco Pardo, 22 Maria-Amelia Pardo, and Victor Pardo’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Opposition to the 23 Motion (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 23) and the County’s Reply (“Reply,” ECF No. 25). Having 24 considered the Parties’ arguments, Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (“SAC,” ECF 25 No. 19), and the law, the Court GRANTS the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.