Fitzpatrick

(PC) Browning v. Fitzpatrick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20251:21-cv-01751California3,304 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4

5 ELRADER BROWNING, III, No. 1:21-cv-1751-GSA (PC)

6 Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

7 vs. THAT PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT PROCEED ON HIS

8 FITZPATRICK, ET AL. CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS

RENTERIA, ARREOLA, AND HADDAD

9 Defendants. FOR EXCESSIVE FORCE UNDER THE

EIGHTH AMENDMENT, AND THAT

10 ALL OTHER CLAIMS AGAINST ALL

OTHER DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED

11

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO

12 RANDOMLY ASSIGN A UNITED

STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

13

14 OBJECTIONS DUE IN 14 DAYS

15 (ECF No. 10); See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(1) 16

17

18

19 20 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Elrader Browning III is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 21 with this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 22 On May 5, 2025, the undersigned screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that it states 23 no viable claims against any Defendants for excessive force under the 8th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.