Fitzpatrick
(PC) Browning v. Fitzpatrick
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20251:21-cv-01751California3,304 words
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5 ELRADER BROWNING, III, No. 1:21-cv-1751-GSA (PC)
6 Plaintiff,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
7 vs. THAT PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT PROCEED ON HIS
8 FITZPATRICK, ET AL. CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS
RENTERIA, ARREOLA, AND HADDAD
9 Defendants. FOR EXCESSIVE FORCE UNDER THE
EIGHTH AMENDMENT, AND THAT
10 ALL OTHER CLAIMS AGAINST ALL
OTHER DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED
11
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO
12 RANDOMLY ASSIGN A UNITED
STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14 OBJECTIONS DUE IN 14 DAYS
15 (ECF No. 10); See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(1) 16
17
18
19 20 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Elrader Browning III is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 21 with this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 22 On May 5, 2025, the undersigned screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that it states 23 no viable claims against any Defendants for excessive force under the 8th…