Whitfield
Whitfield v. Saleh
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 STEVEN WHITFIELD, Case No. 1:22-cv-00141-KES-CDB
9 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
10 v. FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE (1) TO STATE
A CLAIM AND (2) TO PROSECUTE AND
11 KHALIB SALEH, et al., TO OBEY COURT ORDERS AND LOCAL
RULES
12 Defendants. (Doc. 43) 13 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 14 15 Plaintiff Steven Whitfield (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated 16 this action with the filing of a complaint on February 2, 2022. (Docs. 1, 4). On February 24, 17 2023, the Court directed the United States Marshal to serve service documents upon individual 18 Defendants Kimberly Long and Darrell Long (“individual Defendants”) and Defendant Khalib 19 Saleh, owner of CaliMex Supermarket (“Defendant” or “Saleh”). (Doc. 16). Summons returned 20 executed were filed on May 3, 2023, with all responses to the complaint due on May 16, 2023. 21 (Doc. 18). Individual Defendants filed their unopposed motion to dismiss on…