Drishticon, Inc. v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Service
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DRISHTICON, INC., Case No. 24-cv-02443-HSG
8 Plaintiff, ORDER RESOLVING CROSS
MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY
9 v. JUDGMENT
10 UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND Re: Dkt. Nos. 28, 30
IMMIGRATION SERVICE,
11 Defendant. 12 13 Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. Dkt. Nos. 14 28 (“Pl. Mot.”), 30 (“Def. Mot.”). The Court finds these matters appropriate for disposition 15 without oral argument and the matters are deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the 16 reasons detailed below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and 17 GRANTS Defendant’s cross-motion. 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, United States Citizenship and Immigration 20 Services (“USCIS”) grants a limited number of EB-1C visas. See 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(1)(C). 21 These visas are reserved for “certain multinational executives and managers,” who perform a 22 “managerial or executive” role at their employer’s…