Maxwell

Maxwell v. Pacione

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20251:24-cv-00409California630 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHAWN MAXWELL, Case No. 1:24-cv-00409 JLT CDB

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

13 v. RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S CONSTRUED MOTION FOR

14 LISA PACIONE, et al., LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT, AND DISMISSING ACTION

15 Defendants. WITH PREJUDICE

16 (Doc. 73) 17

18 Shawn Maxwell, proceeding pro se, brings this action against judicial officers, 19 governmental agencies, the mother of his child, and others related to paternity and child support 20 determinations. On October 10, 2024, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s original complaint. (Doc. 21 52.) Though certain claims and defendants were dismissed with prejudice, Plaintiff was granted 22 leave to amend his Monell claim and any cognizable state law causes of action against the County 23 Defendants. (Id. at 3.) Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal on November 1, 2024. (Doc. 55.) The 24 Ninth Circuit dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction on December 17, 2024.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.