Bryant

Bryant v. Guzman

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 20253:25-cv-00724California739 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHANNON ANDRE BRYANT, Case No.: 25-cv-0724-AJB (KSC)

CDCR #BV-8320,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER: 13 vs. 14 (1) DENYING SECOND MOTION TO PROCEED IFP AS MOOT; and 15

WARDEN GUZMAN, CHIEF DEPUTY

(2) DISMISSING ACTION FOR 16 WARDEN ESQUIEL, CAPTAIN

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND

HOPPER and PLANT OPERATOR 17 FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

BEATTY,

18 Defendants. 19 20 21 On March 26, 2025, Plaintiff Shannon Andre Bryant, a state prisoner proceeding pro 22 se, filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, along with a Motion to 23 proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF Nos. 1-2.) Plaintiff alleged that while playing 24 basketball at Centinela State Prison in Imperial, California, he stepped on a crack and 25 sprained his ankle due to the Defendants’ negligent maintenance of the basketball court. 26 (See ECF No. 1 at 3.) 27 On April 10, 2025, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to proceed IFP and screened the 28 Complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.