Quicklogic Corporation v. Konda Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20255:21-cv-04657California1,185 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 QUICKLOGIC CORPORATION, Case No. 21-cv-04657-EJD

9 Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

10 v.

11 KONDA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Re: ECF No. 212 Defendants. 12

13 On May 27, 2025, after previously finding an award of attorneys’ fees to be appropriate 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 285, the Court granted some of Plaintiff QuickLogic Corporation’s 15 (“QuickLogic”) requested fees. ECF No. 211 (“May 27 Order”). Of the more than $650,000 that 16 QuickLogic requested, the Court granted a total of $531,918.20. Id. at 4. The Court declined to 17 award some fees because it had insufficient information to determine the reasonableness of certain 18 hours worked and applied an offset to account for QuickLogic’s settlements with attorneys 19 Deepali Brahmbhatt and Derek Dahlgren. Id. at 8. 20 Now before the Court is Konda Technologies, Inc. and Dr. Venkat Konda’s (collectively, 21 “Defendants”) motion for reconsideration of the May 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.