Doe

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20253:25-cv-01453California1,819 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC, Case No.: 25-cv-1453-JLS-MMP

13 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 14 EX-PARTE APPLICATION FOR v. LEAVE TO SERVE A THIRD- 15

PARTY SUBPOENA PRIOR TO A

16 JOHN DOE, subscriber assigned IP RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE address 75.80.98.162, 17

[ECF No. 4] 18 Defendant. 19 20

21 On June 20, 2025, Strike 3 Holdings, LLC’s (“Strike 3”) filed an Ex-Parte 22 Application for Leave to Serve a Third-Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference 23 (“Application”). ECF No. 4. Defendant John Doe (“Defendant”) has not been identified; 24 thus, no opposition has been filed. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS 25 Strike 3’s ex parte Application. 26 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 27 On June 6, 2025, Strike 3 filed a Complaint against Defendant, allegedly a subscriber 28 of Internet Service Provider (“ISP”) Spectrum and assigned Internet Protocol (“IP”) 1 address 75.80.98.162. ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.