Harris

Harris v. Richmond

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20253:25-cv-01574California739 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID D. HARRIS, Case No.: 25-cv-1574-BAS-DDL

CDCR # P-54352

12

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, 13 PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS vs. AND DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION 14

15

NURSE RICHMOND,

16 DR. M. BLAISDELL, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiff David D. Harris, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights 20 Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis 21 (“IFP”). (ECF Nos. 1–2.) 22 I. Motion to Proceed IFP 23 All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the 24 United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of 25 $405, consisting of a $350 statutory fee plus an additional administrative fee of $55, 26 although the administrative fee does not apply to persons granted leave to proceed IFP. 27 See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee 28 Schedule, § 14 (eff. Dec.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.