Borla
Jackson v. Borla
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DERRICK EUGENE JACKSON, Case No. 25-cv-04304-NW
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER SCREENING AND
9 v. DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
10 EDWARD J. BORLA, et al.,
Defendants. 11
12 13 Plaintiff Derrick Eugene Jackson, a state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights complaint 14 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See ECF No. 4. Jackson’s application for leave to proceed in forma 15 pauperis has been granted in a separate order. The Court has screened Jackson’s Complaint; for 16 the reasons set forth below, the Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to filing a 17 habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 Jackson alleges that his sentence is invalid based on changes to his release date. See ECF 20 No. 4 at 3. Jackson was notified of two changes by letter on September 6, 2022, and June 24, 21 2024, with the latter referencing a “calculation correction.” ECF No. 4 at 3. Jackson alleges that 22 he received a 10-year credit and a potential release date of June 20,…