Kessler
Kessler v. City of Atwater
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10
11 BRADLEY S. KESSLER, an individual; BK- Case No.: 1:25-cv-00288 JLT SKO INDUSTRIES, Inc., a California Corporation; 12 AG-K PROPERTIES, LLC, ORDER TO BRIAN K. CUTTONE TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE
13 Plaintiffs, IMPOSED FOR VIOLATIONS OF RULE 11
14 v.
15 CITY OF ATWATER, a Municipal Corporation; et al., 16 Defendants. 17
18 On behalf of the plaintiffs, Mr. Cuttone filed oppositions to the defendants’ motions to dismiss, 19 (Doc. 28, Doc. 28-3) and a reply to the defendants’ motions to remand (Doc. 32). In each filing, it 20 appears to the Court that Mr. Cuttone cited to cases that do not exist, cited to cases that do not stand 21 for the proposition claimed, or included purported quotations that do not exist in the cited case. 22 I. The Briefs 23 Mr. Cuttone’s briefs opposing the motions to dismiss and replying to the opposition to the 24 motion remand, seem to violate the most basic duty imposed on attorneys to be honest with the Court. 25 The Court and its staff have spent…