Brar
Brar v. Microsoft Corporation
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TANBEER SINGH BRAR, Case No. 1:25-cv-00527-CDB
12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO
DISMISS COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF
13 v. SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION,
FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER,
14 MICROSOFT CORPORATION, AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
15 Defendant. (Docs. 1, 6, 7)
16 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PROTECT
RIGHTS
17 (Doc. 7) 18 14-DAY DEADLINE 19 Clerk of the Court to Randomly Assign District 20 Judge
21 22 Plaintiff Tanbeer Singh Brar, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this action 23 with the filing of a complaint against Defendant Microsoft Corporation on May 5, 2025. (Doc. 1). 24 The undersigned addresses Plaintiff’s filings and issues the following findings and 25 recommendations below. 26 I. Factual Allegations and Background 27 Plaintiff’s allegations are difficult to follow but he appears to assert that, among other 1 proceeding in…