(PS) Castaneda v. State of CA DMV

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CHERRISH CASTANEDA, No. 2:24-cv- 0788-DC-SCR 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 STEVE GORDON, 14 Defendant. 15 16 Plaintiff Cherrish Castaneda is proceeding pro se in this action, which was referred to the 17 undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On March 14, 18 2024, Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF No. 3. On 19 December 16, 2024, upon screening the Complaint, the undersigned granted the IFP application 20 but recommended dismissal of every asserted claim. ECF No. 6 at 13. However, the undersigned 21 also recommended that dismissal of claims against Defendant Steve Gordon under 42 U.S.C. § 22 1983 and Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act was to be without prejudice and with 23 leave to amend. Id. On February 6, 2025, District Judge Dena Coggins adopted the Findings and 24 Recommendations and ordered that Plaintiff file any such First Amended Complaint…