Rueter

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEFFREY DICKERSON, No. 2:24-cv-00919 SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 KEVIN RUETER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 17, 2025, the undersigned screened plaintiff’s complaint and determined 19 it failed to state claims upon which relief may be granted. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff was given the 20 option of filing an amended complaint. (Id. at 5.) He was further advised that his failure to file an 21 amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to 22 Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Id.) 23 On April 29, 2025, the screening order was returned by the U.S. Postal Service. (See 24 Docket.) Under Local Rule 182(f), a pro se party is under a continuing duty to notify the Clerk of 25 the Court of any change of address. Absent such notice, service of…