(PS) Rogers v. Mountain Valley Unified School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20252:24-cv-02587California2,049 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY ROGERS, et al., Case No. 2:24-cv-02587-TLN-CSK 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER 14 MOUNTAIN VALLEY UNIFIED (ECF Nos. 8, 9, 13, 14) SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiffs Anthony Rogers and Roberto Romero are proceeding in this action pro 18 se.1 Pending before the Court are the following motions: (1) Plaintiffs’ motion for 19 permission to e-file documents (ECF No. 8); (2) Plaintiffs’ motion to appoint guardian ad 20 litem (ECF No. 9); (3) Plaintiffs’ motion to appoint counsel (ECF No. 13); and 21 (4) Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 14). No 22 opposition has been filed to the motions. The first motion is one for administrative relief 23 and is submitted without a hearing. E.D. Cal. L.R. 233. Pursuant to E.D. Cal. Local Rule 24 230(g), the remaining motions are submitted upon the record and the briefs. 25 1. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Permission to E-File Documents (ECF No. 8) 26 Plaintiffs request permission…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.