Malekkhatei

Malekkhatei v. National Visa Center

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20252:25-cv-01397California687 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHILA MALEKKHATEI, et al., Case No. 2:25-cv-01397-CSK 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR APPOINTMENT AS GUARDIAN AD

14 NATIONAL VISA CENTER, et al., LITEM 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 3) 16 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Shila Malekkhatei and Farzad 18 Hezhabrinobari’s motion for appointment as guardian ad litem for Plaintiff I.H.1 Pls. Mot. 19 (ECF No. 3). No opposition has been filed to the motion. For the reasons that follow, the 20 Court denies Plaintiffs’ motion without prejudice. 21 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 17, a representative of a minor or 22 incompetent person may sue or defend on the minor or incompetent person's behalf. 23 Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c). “District courts have a special duty, derived from Federal Rule of 24 Civil Procedure 17(c), to safeguard the interests of litigants who are minors.” Robidoux v. 25 Rosengren, 638 F.3d 1177, 1181 (9th Cir. 2011). In addition, a court “must appoint a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.