(PS) Tokmo v. Pactiv Evergreen Group Holdings Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CANDICE TOKMO, No. 2:25-cv-1614-DAD-CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 PACTIV EVERGREEN GROUP

HOLDINGS INC.,

15 Defendants. 16 17 Proceeding pro se, plaintiff Candice Tokmo initiated this action in the San Joaquin County 18 Superior Court and defendants removed it to this court. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff’s recently filed 19 motions and requests are before the court. (ECF Nos. 34, 36, 42, 45, 46.) 20 Request for Clarification (ECF No. 34) 21 Plaintiff requests “clarification from the Court regarding the appropriate point(s) of 22 contact for communication and service of documents with Defense Counsel.” (ECF No. 34 at 1.) 23 The request for clarification is granted to the extent that the court clarifies that notice of an 24 electronic filing is automatically generated by CM/ECF at the time a document is filed. See Local 25 Rule 135. This notice constitutes automatic service of the document within the meaning of Rule 26 5(b)(2)(E) of the Federal Rules of Civil…