(PS) Logan v. Mobile Gas Station

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20252:25-cv-01906California842 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERNEST GODFREY LOGAN, Jr., No. 2:25-cv-01906-DJC-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 MOBILE GAS STATION, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis. 18 ECF Nos. 1 & 2. This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 19 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Venue does not lie in this District. For the following reasons, the Court will 20 transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. 21 Plaintiff filed his complaint on July 7, 2025. ECF No. 1. The caption of the complaint 22 states “Central District of California.” Id. at 1. Plaintiff lists his address as Los Angeles, 23 California. Id. Plaintiff names as a defendant a gas station in Los Angeles. Id. at 1. He also 24 names a cashier at the gas station and two Los Angeles police officers. Id. at 2-3. The factual 25 allegations are unclear, but the complaint mentions events at a gas…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.