Vilcauskas

United States v. Vilcauskas

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 14, 202524-1516California838 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-1516 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:19-cr-00752-DGC-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

ANDREW JAMES VILCAUSKAS, Jr., DBA WebsiteBackup LLC,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 10, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: H.A. THOMAS and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF, District Judge.***

Andrew Vilcauskas, Jr. appeals the district court’s order denying his motion

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. to withdraw his guilty plea. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

review a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.