Sharpe

Sharpe v. United States Federal Highway Administration

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 14, 202524-3475California379 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LOGAN SHARPE, No. 24-3475 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:24-cv-00045-TOR v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES FEDERAL HIGHWAY

ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Thomas O. Rice, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 10, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: GRABER, CLIFTON, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Logan Sharpe timely appeals from the dismissal of his complaint

under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552, against the United

States Federal Highway Administration (“the Agency”). We dismiss this appeal as

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). moot, vacate the district court’s judgment, and remand the case for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.