Msc Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. v. Bnsf Railway Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 14, 202524-3957California722 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MSC MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING No. 24-3957 COMPANY S.A., D.C. No. 2:23-cv-09693-JLS-AJR Plaintiff - Appellant,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 6, 2025 Pasadena, California

Before: HURWITZ, MILLER, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Under a through bill of lading with both ocean and rail legs, MSC

Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. (MSC) transported cargo for a third party

from the Port of Zhongshan in China to Kansas City via the Port of Los Angeles.

MSC subcontracted with BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) to perform the rail leg

from Los Angeles to Kansas City. After MSC settled a claim for cargo loss or

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. damage with the cargo owner’s insurer, it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.