Morrow

Morrow v. Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 14, 202524-3711California1,552 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MATTHEW MORROW, No. 24-3711 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-00642-MTL v.

MEMORANDUM*

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Michael T. Liburdi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 2, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: CALLAHAN, BADE, and KOH, Circuit Judges. Partial concurrence and partial dissent by Judge KOH.

Plaintiff-Appellant Matthew Morrow appeals a district court order upholding

the denial of Social Security disability benefits by an administrative law judge

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“ALJ”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the

district court’s order de novo and will…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.