People v. Choi CA2/7

DISCUSSION

We appointed counsel to represent Choi in this appeal. After reviewing the record, counsel filed a brief raising no issues. Counsel advised Choi on April 10, 2025 that he could personally submit any contentions or issues he wanted the court to consider. Counsel also sent Choi the transcripts of the record on appeal and a copy of the appellate brief. On April 11, 2025 this court also sent Choi notice that, “[w]ithin 30 days of this notice, appellant may submit a supplemental brief stating any grounds for an appeal, or contention, or arguments which appellant wishes this court to consider.” We did not receive a response from Choi. We have examined the record and are satisfied that appellate counsel for Choi has complied with his responsibilities and that there are no arguable issues. (Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 277-284; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 118- 119; People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at pp. 441-442.)

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

SEGAL, J.

We concur:

MARTINEZ, P. J. FEUER, J.

4