McNiven
McNiven v. Dreyfus CA1/3
Opinion
Opinion
Guez, J.
Filed 7/14/25 McNiven v. Dreyfus CA1/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
CAROLYN McNIVEN et al., as Trustees, etc., Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Respondents;
A169807
ANDREW SOHN,
(Alameda County Cross-defendant and Super. Ct. No. RG18918709) Respondent, v. KAREN DREYFUS et al., Defendants, Cross- complainants and Appellants.
After extensive litigation over the validity of a restrictive covenant, the trial court ordered Karen and Michael Dreyfus (the Dreyfuses) to pay Carolyn McNiven, Marion McNiven, and Andrew Sohn $927,249.19 in prevailing party attorney fees under Civil Code section 1717 (undesignated statutory references are to this code). The Dreyfuses appeal, arguing the court erred in its prevailing party determination and…