Thieriot

Thieriot v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 14, 20253:24-cv-07476California963 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 ELISABETH I. THIERIOT, Case No. 24-cv-07476-CRB

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

10 v.

RECOMMENDATION;

DISMISSING CASE

11 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 Plaintiff Elisabeth Thieriot sues Defendants Pacific Gas & Electric Company and 15 Mari Kryder Becker (allegedly a PG&E executive) for ending service to her home after she 16 failed to pay her bills and instead sent an IRS Form that, according to her, required the 17 U.S. government to pay her utility bills. SAC (dkt. 16) ¶¶ 15, 58–67, 74. She asserts 18 claims under the U.S. Constitution, the Uniform Commercial Code, and federal and state 19 statutes. Id. ¶¶ 22–51. Magistrate Judge Alex Tse screened Thieriot’s initial and first 20 amended complaints, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), and found them frivolous. See First 21 Screening Order (dkt. 7); Second Screening Order (dkt. 13). Judge Tse then issued a 22 report and recommendation with respect to Thieriot’s second amended complaint that the 23 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.