Rissi
Rissi v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EMILY DOCKHAM RISSI, Case No.: 24-cv-00267-AJB-KSC Plaintiff, 12
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT T-
13 v. MOBILE USA, INC.’S MOTION TO
STAY
14 T-MOBILE USA, INC., et al., 15 Defendants. (Doc. No. 45)
16
17 18 Before the Court is Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc.’s (“T-Mobile”) motion to stay 19 the instant action pending the outcome of Plaintiff Emily Dockham Rissi (“Plaintiff”) and 20 NextGen Global Resources, LLC’s (“NextGen”) arbitration. (Doc. No. 45.) For the reasons 21 set forth below, the Court DENIES T-Mobile’s motion. 22 I. BACKGROUND 23 This action concerns Plaintiff’s allegations regarding employment with Defendants 24 T-Mobile, NextGen and Kineticom, Inc., (collectively “Defendants”). (See Doc. No. 1-2, 25 “Compl.” at 10–27.) Plaintiff alleges that in October 2020 she was contracted by Kineticom 26 to perform work exclusively for T-Mobile. (Id. ¶¶ 13–14.) 27 In May 2021, Plaintiff accepted a full-time position with T-Mobile in San Diego that 28 she…