Cribier

Cribier v. Compass, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 14, 20253:25-cv-02815California4,096 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MICHAEL CRIBIER, individually and on Case No. 25-cv-02815-WHO behalf of all others similarly situated, 8 ORDER TRANSFERRING VENUE Plaintiff, Re: Dkt. No. 16. 9 v. 10

COMPASS, INC.,

11 Defendant.

12 13 In this nationwide class action, plaintiff Michael Cribier alleges that defendant Compass, 14 Inc. (“Compass”), a national real estate brokerage company, violated the Telephone Consumer 15 Protection Act of 1991 (the “TPCA”) by “cold-calling” potential clients whose numbers were on 16 the National Do Not Call Registry. None of the parties reside in this district and none of the 17 events giving rise to Cribier’s claims occurred here. The Compass agents who “cold-called” 18 Cribier worked for a Compass branch that operates out of San Diego, California, which is within 19 the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Cribier 20 himself lives in Las Vegas, Nevada, which is also not within this district. 21 Compass moved to dismiss the case for improper…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.