Alvarado

Williams v. Alvarado

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 11, 20253:24-cv-01501California2,622 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LANCE WILLIAMS, Case No.: 24-cv-01501-WQH-LR

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

13 vs. ACTION FOR FAILING TO

STATE CLAIM PURSUANT

14 M. ALVARADO, Correctional Counselor; TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)

N. ERICKSON, Correctional Officer;

15

A. RENDON, Correctional Officer,

[ECF No. 4] 16 17 Defendants. 18 HAYES, Judge: 19 Before the Court is an amended civil rights complaint filed by former state prisoner 20 Lance Williams, who is proceeding in forma pauperis and without counsel. (ECF No. 4.) 21 Williams’s original complaint was dismissed sua sponte for failing to state a claim upon 22 which § 1983 relief can be granted because it was untimely on its face. (ECF No. 3.) The 23 Court granted Williams leave to amend in order to allege facts which might entitle him to 24 equitable tolling, but his amended complaint fails to do so. 25 Therefore, for the reasons explained, the Court now DISMISSES this civil action in 26 its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.