Cox

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 RODRIC PETRECE STANLEY, JR., Case No. 25-cv-03630-JD

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER RE DISMISSAL

v. 10

11 COX, et al., Defendants. 12

13 14 Plaintiff, a convicted prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 15 The original complaint was dismissed with leave to amend, and plaintiff filed an amended 16 complaint. 17 DISCUSSION 18 STANDARD OF REVIEW 19 Federal courts engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress 20 from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. 21 § 1915A(a). The Court will identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims which are 22 frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek monetary relief 23 from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Id. at 1915A(b)(1),(2). Pro se pleadings are 24 liberally construed. Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep’t, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1990). 25 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…