Gibralter, LLC v. DMS Flowers, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 14, 20251:24-cv-00174California7,572 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GIBRALTER, LLC, et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-00174-CDB

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING CROSS-DEFENDANT

TELEFLORA, LLC’S UNOPPOSED REQUEST

13 v. FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE 14 DMS FLOWERS, LLC, et al., (Doc. 106-2) 15 Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING CROSS-DEFENDANT

16

TELEFLORA, LLC’S MOTION TO DISMISS

THE FIRST AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT

17

WITH LEAVE TO AMEND CERTAIN

18 CLAIMS

19 (Doc. 106)

20 Pending before the Court1 is the motion of Defendant/Cross-Defendant Teleflora, LLC 21 (“Teleflora”) to dismiss the first amended cross-complaint (“FACC”) of Defendants Daniel 22 Andrade (“Andrade”), Samantha Andrade, DMS Flowers, LLC, and Maria Pantoja (collectively, 23 the “DMS Flowers Defendants”) and request therein for judicial notice, filed on May 23, 2025. 24 (Docs. 106, 106-2). On June 6, 2025, DMS Flowers Defendants filed an opposition to the motion 25 to dismiss, and on June 16, 2025, Teleflora filed a reply. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.