(PC) Truschke-Harpster v. Tuolumne County Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 14, 20251:24-cv-00547California1,642 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TAMMI TRUSCHKE-HARPSTER, Case No. 1:24-cv-00547-CDB (PC)

12 Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

13 v. TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT

PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY

14 TUOLUMNE COUNTY JAIL, WITH COURT ORDERS AND FAILURE

TO PROSECUTE

15 Defendant.

16 (Docs. 6, 7, 11)

17 14-DAY DEADLINE 18 Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge 19

20 Plaintiff Tammi Truschke-Harpster is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights 21 action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 9, 2024, Plaintiff initiated this action with the 22 filing a complaint. (Doc. 1). At the same time, Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma 23 pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. 2). 24 I. Background 25 On March 13, 2025, the undersigned issued the first screening order, finding that Plaintiff 26 failed to state any cognizable claims and granting leave to amend. (Doc. 6). Plaintiff was 27 directed to respond…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.