Meyer

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KENI MAE MEYER, Case No. 24-cv-09056-HSG

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

9 v. DISMISS

10 COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 18 11 Defendants.

12 13 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss.1 Dkt. No. 18. The Court finds 14 this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. 15 See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and 16 DENIES IN PART the motion. 17 I. REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE 18 Defendants have filed requests for judicial notice in support of their motion to dismiss. 19 See Dkt. No. 19. Specifically, Defendants ask the Court to take judicial notice of various court 20 filings discussed in more detail below. Id. The Court GRANTS Defendants’ requests and takes 21 judicial notice of (1) the fact that these cases and documents were filed, and (2) of any judicial 22 findings contained…