Brand Energy Services of California v. Heat and Frost Insulators and Allied Workers Local Union No. 16

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 BRAND ENERGY SERVICES OF Case No. 3:25-cv-00374-AMO 11

CALIFORNIA,

12 ORDER DISMISSING BRAND Plaintiff, ENERGY SERVICES OF 13 CALIFORNIA’S COMPLAINT v. 14 15 HEAT AND FROST INSULATORS AND

ALLIED WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 16,

16 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 ORDER DISMISSING 9 BRAND ENERGY SERVICES OF CALIFORNIA’S COMPLAINT 3 Before the Court is Defendant Heat and Frost Insulators and Allied Workers Local No. 16’s 4 (“Local 16”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Brand Energy Services of California’s (“Brand”) Complaint 5 pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Local 16 contends that Plaintiff 6 || failed to adequately plead his claim as required by Rule 8(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil 7 || Procedure as interpreted by Ashcroft v. Igbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009). 8 Brand fails to plead facts showing a violation of the secondary boycott provisions of the Labor 9 || Management…