Eden

Eden v. Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 10, 202524-5963California886 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DREW EDEN, No. 24-5963 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:24-cv-00111-LB v.

MEMORANDUM*

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Laurel D. Beeler, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 8, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, NGUYEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Drew Eden appeals from a district court decision affirming the Commissioner

of Social Security’s denial of his application for Social Security disability benefits.

“We ‘review the district court’s order affirming the ALJ’s denial of social security

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). benefits de novo and will disturb the denial of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.