Alvarez-Ayala

Alvarez-Ayala v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 10, 202524-3249California1,123 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE ALVAREZ-AYALA, No. 24-3249 Agency No. Petitioner, A088-521-918 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 18, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: GOULD and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges, and PITMAN, District Judge.***

Petitioner Jose Alvarez-Ayala (“Alvarez-Ayala”) petitions our Court to vacate

the Executive Office of Immigration Review (“EOIR”) Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”)

decision affirming the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) asylum officer’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Robert Pitman, United States District Judge for the Western District of Texas, sitting by designation. negative reasonable fear…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.