Elghembri

Elghembri v. White

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20253:24-cv-02773California1,181 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 AHMED MOHAMMAD ELGHEMBRI, Case No. 24-cv-02773-WHO (PR)

Plaintiff, 8

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v. 9

10 WHITE, et al., Defendants. 11

12 13 INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff Ahmed Mohamed Elghembri alleges that prison mental health staff failed 15 to provide him with adequate mental health care, thereby violating his Eighth Amendment 16 rights. His first amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint containing these allegations is now 17 before me for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). 18 This federal civil rights action is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim for relief. 19 He fails to identify by name the prison psychiatrist who failed to meet with him during his 20 distress, and his allegations against that psychiatrist fail to show more than a possibility 21 that the defendant acted unlawfully. And his allegations against his assigned psychologist, 22 Dr. White, are conclusory, lacking any specific details about what treatment he feels he 23 should have received and what treatment White did and did not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.