Corrales

Corrales v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20253:23-cv-01468California1,670 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE CORRALES, et al., Case No.: 23-cv-01468-AJB-VET Plaintiffs, 12

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. 13 WITHDRAW AS LOCAL COUNSEL COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., 14 Defendants. (Doc. No. 81) 15

16 17 Before the Court is a motion to withdraw as local counsel for Minor Plaintiffs Z.C., 18 A.C., and C.C. (“Minor Plaintiffs”) by and through their guardian ad litem Heidi Gonzalez, 19 filed by local counsel Burris, Nisenbaum, Curry, and Lacy LLP (“BNCL”). (Doc. No. 81.) 20 For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion to withdraw. 21 I. BACKGROUND 22 On February 16, 2024, Minor Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint against 23 Defendants County of San Diego and Anthony Garcia (“Defendants”), alleging violations 24 of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution, wrongful death, 25 negligence, assault/battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and a violation of 26 the Tom Bane Act. (Doc. No. 25, First Amended Complaint (“FAC”).) On April 9,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.