Esthela Ocampo Rosales v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20258:25-cv-02046California1,511 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

I. Background

This is a personal injury action. Plaintiff Esthela Ocampo Rosales (“Plaintiff”) slipped and fell on a slippery substance on the floor of a Costco store in San Juan Capistrano, CA on July 25, 2023. Complaint (“Compl.”) (Dkt. 1-1). Plaintiff alleges that there were no tapes, signs, cones, or other devices to warn customers of the slippery floor. Id. Plaintiff alleges causes of action for negligence, premises liability, and willful failure to warn against Defendants Costco Wholesale Corporation, and Does 1-50 (“Defendant”). Id.

Plaintiffs originally filed suit in the Superior Court of California, County of Orange, on July 10, 2025, and Defendant was served on August 13, 2025. Notice of Removal (“Not.”) (Dkt. 1). On September 10, 2025, Defendant removed the action to this Court, asserting diversity jurisdiction. Id.

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 8:25-cv-02046-DOC-KES Date: September 24, 2025 Page 2

II. Legal Standard

“If at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Removal of a case from state court to federal court is governed by 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.