Lehman
Lehman v. United States
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KENT G. LEHMAN, Case No.: 3:25-cv-02224-JES-DDL
12 Plaintiff,
ORDER:
13 v. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO 14 THE UNITED STATES, PAMELA
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS;
BONDI, and JESSE HART, 15 Defendants. (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT 16
PURSUANT TO SCREENING
17 UNDER § 1915(e);
18 (3) DENYING MOTION FOR 19 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; and
20 (4) DENYING MOTION FOR 21 HEARING AS MOOT
22 [ECF Nos. 4, 7] 23
24
25 26 27 28 1 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Kent Lehman’s renewed motion for leave to 2 proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), motion for hearing, and motion for preliminary 3 injunction. ECF Nos. 4, 7. After due consideration and for the reasons set forth below, the 4 Court GRANTS the motion to proceed IFP, DENIES the motion for hearing as moot, 5 DENIES the motion for preliminary injunction and DISMISSES the case. 6 I. Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis…