Lehman

Lehman v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20253:25-cv-02224California1,120 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KENT G. LEHMAN, Case No.: 3:25-cv-02224-JES-DDL

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER:

13 v. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO 14 THE UNITED STATES, PAMELA

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS;

BONDI, and JESSE HART, 15 Defendants. (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT 16

PURSUANT TO SCREENING

17 UNDER § 1915(e);

18 (3) DENYING MOTION FOR 19 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; and

20 (4) DENYING MOTION FOR 21 HEARING AS MOOT

22 [ECF Nos. 4, 7] 23

24

25 26 27 28 1 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Kent Lehman’s renewed motion for leave to 2 proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), motion for hearing, and motion for preliminary 3 injunction. ECF Nos. 4, 7. After due consideration and for the reasons set forth below, the 4 Court GRANTS the motion to proceed IFP, DENIES the motion for hearing as moot, 5 DENIES the motion for preliminary injunction and DISMISSES the case. 6 I. Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.