Khalaf

Khalaf v. Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20253:25-cv-02246California2,284 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HAMDI ABDEL MUNIM ABU Case No.: 3:25-cv-02246-H-JLB KHALAF, et al., 12

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

Plaintiffs, 13 MOTION TO REMAND v. 14 [Doc. No. 10.]

BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY

15 ASSURANCE CORPORATION, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 On September 8, 2025, Plaintiffs Hamdi Abdel Munim Abu Khalaf and Aladdin 19 Clairemont & MKT, Inc. (“Aladdin’s Café”) filed a motion to remand. (Doc. No. 10.) On 20 September 22, 2025, Defendant AmGuard Insurance Company (“AmGuard”) filed a 21 response in opposition to Plaintiff’s motion. (Doc. No. 12.) On September 26, 2025, 22 Plaintiff filed a reply. (Doc. No. 13.) 23 The Court set a hearing on Plaintiff’s motion for Monday, October 6, 2025 at 10:30 24 a.m. Pursuant to its discretion under Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), the Court determines that the 25 motion is fit for resolution without oral argument, submits the motion on the parties’ 26 papers, and vacates the hearing. For the reasons below, the Court denies Plaintiff’s motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.