Walton

Walton v. Smith

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20253:23-cv-04843California273 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 DENISHA M WALTON, et al., Case No. 23-cv-04843-MMC 6 Plaintiffs, ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFFS'

V. NOTICE OF FILING SUPPLEMENTAL

STATEMENT

8 KEE ANA SMITH, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 36 9 Defendants. 10 11 Before the Court is plaintiffs’ “Notice of Filing Supplemental Statement,” consisting 12 || of voluminous documents submitted in support of a “Petition to Perpetuate Testimony

2 13 || and Preserve Evidence [,] (Fed. R. Civ. P. 27)” contained therein.'

0 14 Rule 27 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits, “before an action is filed,”

8 15 || the “filling of] a verified petition in the district court for the district where any expected

QO 16 || adverse party resides” for the purpose of obtaining an order “authorizing the petitioner to Cc @ 17 || depose ...named persons.” See Fed. R. Civ. P. 27(a)(1). 18 Rule 27 does not, however, allow for the filing of such a petition in another case. 19 Accordingly, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.