Google LLC v. Point Financial, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20255:25-cv-04033California1,055 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 GOOGLE LLC, Case No. 25-cv-04033-BLF

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING GOOGLE LLC'S 9 v. RENEWED MOTION FOR FURTHER

REDACTIONS

10 POINT FINANCIAL, INC., [Re: ECF No. 119] 11 Defendant.

12 13 Before the Court is Google LLC’s renewed Administrative Motion for Further Redactions. 14 ECF No. 119 (“Mot.”). Defendant Point Financial, Inc. submitted a response in opposition. ECF 15 No. 122 (“Opp.”). For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS the renewed Administrative 16 Motion for Further Redactions. 17 I. LEGAL STANDARD 18 “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records 19 and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of 20 Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 21 U.S. 589, 597 & n.7 (1978)). Accordingly, when considering a sealing request, “a ‘strong 22 presumption in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.