Wine

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6

MITCHELL WINE,

7 Case No. 25-cv-03336-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 9 RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION

10 BOARD, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 61 11 Defendants.

12 13 14 On October 6, 2025, Plaintiff brought a motion “request[ing] rulings ‘forthwith’ and 15 immediately on all pending matters, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3771.” Dkt. no. 58 (“Motion to 16 Expedite”) at p. 2. Previously, Plaintiff had asked the Court to decide the pending motions in the 17 case without a hearing, asserting that the issues raised in the substantive motions were fully 18 briefed and that a hearing was not required. See dkt. no. 47. On October 7, 2025, the Court ruled 19 on all of the substantive motions pending in the case and vacated the scheduled motion hearing. 20 Dkt. no. 59. Because the only relief requested in the Motion to Expedite was an immediate ruling 21 on the substantive motions, the Court denied that…