Doe
Doe v. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 JANE DOE, Case No.: 3:24-cv-00217-JLS-AHG 13 Plaintiff, ORDER:
14 v. (1) DENYING IN PART JOINT 15 WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, MOTION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY INC., et al., DEADLINES, and 16
Defendants. 17 (2) ISSUING FIRST AMENDED
SCHEDULING ORDER
18
19 [ECF No. 185] 20 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Extend Scheduling Order Deadlines. 21 ECF No. 185. 22 Parties seeking to continue deadlines in the scheduling order must demonstrate good 23 cause. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with 24 the judge’s consent”); see also ECF No. 177 at 6 (Scheduling Order, stating that “[t]he 25 dates [] set forth herein will not be modified except for good cause shown”); Chmb.R. at 2 26 (stating that any request for continuance requires “[a] showing of good cause for the 27 request”). Courts have broad discretion in determining…