Aguilar

Aguilar v. Napa County

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20255:25-cv-02161California1,167 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 EDGAR AGUILAR, Case No. 25-cv-02161-PCP

8 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

WITH LEAVE TO AMEND;

9 v. GRANTING APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS;

10 NAPA COUNTY, et al., DENYING MOTION FOR PRO BONO

COUNSEL

Defendants. 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 8, 9 12

13 Edgar Aguilar, an inmate at Pelican Bay State Prison in Crescent City, California, filed a 14 pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 regarding events that occurred while he was held 15 at Napa County Jail. Dkt. No. 7. 16 Mr. Aguilar states on the face of his pleading that it was filed as a placeholder to comply 17 with a time limitation, that the pleading is incomplete, and that he intends to “amend his pleading 18 setting forth the full factual claims for relief” when his “time permits.” Id. at 30. Although it has 19 been six months since he made that statement, Mr. Aguilar has yet to amend his pleading. See 20 generally Dkt. 21 The Court cannot meaningfully evaluate claims that are not supported by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.